The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime in an economically difficult situation.

The defendant recognizes his criminal act and is against himself.

However, as a result of the instant crime, the victim company suffered damage equivalent to the market price of rocketing vehicles, and did not recover the damage.

The Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of this type.

In light of such circumstances and the defendant's age, sex, family relation, motive, means and consequence of the crime, all of the sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments, such as the circumstances after the crime, and the scope of recommended sentences of sentencing guidelines [decision of type] [No person who has a special sentencing seal] [the scope of recommended punishment] and the basic area (6 months to 1 year) of the basic area (the scope of recommended punishment], etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable.

The defendant's argument of sentencing is not acceptable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.