The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts are favorable to the Defendant.

Defendant would not drive drinking again, against the crime and again;

There are many things.

An agreement has been reached with the victim of the traffic accident.

There is no record of criminal punishment exceeding a fine for the defendant.

On the other hand, the following is disadvantageous.

The defendant has a record of criminal punishment for five times together with a drinking driving and a non-licensed driving.

At the time of the instant case, the alcohol concentration of the Defendant’s blood was very high to 0.196%.

Since drinking of this case or driving without a license of this case caused a traffic accident, it was immediately stopped and does not take necessary measures, and the nature of the crime is bad.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, and circumstances after the instant crime, etc., as well as the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.