Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On August 7, 2012, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 from the Seoul Southern District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

On June 25, 2020, at around 01:30, the Defendant driven a car in the B B B B B lueri, while under the influence of alcohol content 0.070% from approximately 500 meters away from the road near Pungpo-si, Kimpo-si, 542-3, Kimpo-si to the road near Pungpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, 715.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. The written statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol C to the defendant's legal statement, the statement of the situation of the driver, and the notification of the results of drinking driving control;

1. A traffic accident report, a survey report on the actual condition of traffic accidents, a report on the occurrence of traffic accidents, a register of driver's licenses on 112 reported field photographs, the register of car driving licenses on the 112 reported cases, the next inquiry and the investigation report on mandatory insurance companies;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports (reports attached to summary orders of the same criminal records as suspects), and application of summary order statutes;

1. The relevant provision on criminal facts, Articles 148-2(1) and 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking driving), the selection of a fine (the defendant is punished by a fine in consideration of the fact that he/she again committed the crime of drinking under the influence of alcohol in 2012 even if he/she was sentenced to a fine for driving under the influence of alcohol and driving without permission in 2012), and the risk of repeating the crime of this case, and the fact that he/she actually caused an accident of receiving a vehicle parked in the remainder of the drunk while under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the crime of this case, is not good: Provided, That the defendant confessions all of the crimes of this case and is against depth; the defendant was not punished for driving under the influence of alcohol after 2012; there was no other criminal punishment differently than the fine, and that the degree of blood alcohol at the time of committing the crime

1. Discretionary mitigation Criminal Act;