(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.04.03 2014고정2114

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.04.03 2014고정2114

폭행등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 25, 2014, around 15:40 on September 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) opened the door of the D Village bus, a limited liability company owned by the victim C, on the roads front of the new Dong-dong apartment site in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul, which was located in 250; (b) however, the Defendant did not open a door to the effect that E, a bus driver, is not capable of burning because he is not a bus stop; (c) as such, the Defendant’s motive for committing the crime of destroying and damaging property is stated in the written indictment that “the Defendant’s motive for committing the crime of destroying and damaging property was that it was not visible to get out of the village.”

On the other hand, the defendant argued that the village bus door is opened to ask about the way, and according to the witness E's partial statement, the defendant opened the door to ask about the way.

The basic facts are identical to each other, as the community bus article refuses the demand of opening a door to the effect that it was caused to commit the above crime. Thus, the aforementioned motive part of the crime ex officio without a separate amendment process is changed to the purport that “the community bus will open the door, but it will not open the door.”

Maragly, the adjacent part of the bus was set up once, and the flag was left.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place stated in paragraph 1, flicked the Defendant’s bank down from the bus and demanded compensation for damage in relation to flicking of the bus, the Defendant flicked the victim’s left flick and flicked the Defendant’s flick with the left hand by walking the flick.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to comprehensive reports on motor vehicles' details;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2020.10.28 2020고정687

-서울남부지방법원 2020.02.06 2019고정1494

-춘천지방법원 속초지원 2014.01.22 2013고단520

-인천지방법원 2014.11.13 2014고단7160

-대구지방법원 2015.12.24 2015고단5527