beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is that it is insufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff's assertion as evidence additionally submitted by this court, and it is not sufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff's assertion, the statement No. 9, No. 10-1, and No. 2, and each fact-finding with respect to B prisons of this court, and the result of the plaintiff's identity inquiry and the result of the plaintiff's identity inquiry with respect to the plaintiff's argument emphasized or added by this court, and except for adding "the additional decision" as to the plaintiff's argument, it is identical to the corresponding part of the reasons of
2. Additional determination
A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff’s failure to receive an appropriate treatment during the period from May 20, 2013 to May 23, 2013, which was caused by the Plaintiff to go to the GN, was not allowed for a medical officer to receive the Plaintiff’s tour medical treatment on the ground that the officer in charge of B prison at the time of the Plaintiff’s request for medical treatment did not submit in advance the Plaintiff’s tour medical treatment application. (ii) On May 24, 2013, the Plaintiff, despite the continued medical treatment with the B prison’s medical department for one week after May 24, 2013, required an emergency symptoms requiring a prompt treatment of an external hospital depending on South Korea, but the officer in charge of the correctional officer and the medical officer did not request the Plaintiff, and for this reason, submitted a written out report on the outside on June 7, 2013.
3) Since public officials belonging to the smuggling detention center have been aware that the Plaintiff was suffering from severe urology, the Plaintiff was constantly and individually interested in the Plaintiff, even if he was passive in the Plaintiff’s pain treatment, he/she was equipped with medical personnel and equipment for medical treatment and treatment (at the time of need, he/she had a duty of care to conduct regular medical examinations with outside hospitals and to take medical measures necessary for the treatment, but has fulfilled his/her duty of care.