A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who works as the head of the process management department of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. from March 2013 to March 2016 and has been engaged in the affairs of contracting, contracting, and management of the company. The victim C is the representative of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd.

The defendant is engaged in the above business, and the victim is in a position to receive a subcontract from the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., thereby entering into a subcontract for the construction work to the victim, such as the defendant "I will start the construction work, I will start the construction work, I will bring it to the width, and I will bring it to 700 million won in the year."

1. Around May 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement that “the Defendant borrowed money to the victim “on the basis of an urgent need for the payment of money; and (b) the amount to be reduced after the loan was made.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the right to decide on the subcontract construction of the "B", and the defendant did not have the ability to subcontract the construction work of the "B" to the victim, and even if he borrowed money from the victim due to the lack of living expenses at the time, he did not have the intention

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received a total of KRW 20,91,000 from August 21, 2016, including by deceiving the victim and receiving KRW 1 million in cash from the victim, namely, from August 21, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On October 19, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement that “A vehicle to be driven by his/her wife is required, and a vehicle cannot be contracted under the name of his/her own credit because he/she is not good, and thus, he/she would be able to pay an installment on the face of his/her own in the name of the victim.”

However, the defendant did not have the ability to subcontract the construction work of the "B" to the victim because he did not have the right to decide on the subcontract construction work of the "B".