The defendant's 2,602,820 won against the plaintiff Eul, 706,760 won against the plaintiff Eul, and 773,360 won against the plaintiff Eul and each of the above amounts.

1. Details of ruling;

A. (1) On July 4, 2013, the head of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the head of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City announced the approval for the implementation of the project for the "D Innovation Promotion Zone Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project" pursuant to Article 28 (4) of the former Act (wholly amended by Act No. 14567, Feb. 8, 2017; hereinafter referred to as the "Urban Improvement Promotion Zone Act") (Notice E) (2) The plaintiffs are three underground floors and nine underground floors in the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, located in the improvement zone in this case, and the third underground floors and nine underground floors are parking lots; the first underground floors and the second underground floors are apartment units from the fourth to the fourth underground floors; the fifth to the fourth apartment units from the ground surface are divided into 18 units, and each household unit is divided into 14 to the fourth underground floors.

It is part of the right holder of sales facilities.

According to the registration record of the divided building, the share registration has been completed, but the number of each store at the time of sale has been allocated at the time of sale and the transaction has been made at each store in the market, the number of each store is indicated in the registration record of the divided building, and the plaintiffs' shares are indicated in the registration record of the divided building.

B. On March 23, 2018, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Local Land Expropriation Committee rendered a ruling to accept each of the stores and the right to use the site listed in the separate sheet owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “each of the stores of this case”) on the basis of the amount stated in the column of “compensation for expropriation” in the same sheet, and the starting date of expropriation as of May 11, 2018 (hereinafter “instant adjudication on expropriation”).

(c)

The Plaintiffs raised an objection against the adjudication by the Central Land Expropriation Committee, and the Central Land Expropriation Committee filed an objection against the adjudication of expropriation of this case, respectively.