beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiffs are all foreigners of Mongolian nationality. ① Plaintiff A entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status and was staying there on June 12, 2015. ② Plaintiff B entered the Republic of Korea with the husband of Plaintiff A, and non-professional employment (E-9) sojourn status, and entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status after having entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term visit (D-4) sojourn status after having entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term visit (C-3), and Plaintiff A was staying with a change of a general training (D-3) sojourn status after having entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status; ③ Plaintiff C and D entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term visit (C-3); and Plaintiff A, a mother of Plaintiff C and D, a person whose sojourn status had been changed to obtain a general training (D-4) status (F-3).
B. The Plaintiffs filed an application for the extension of the period of stay with the Defendant on May 2, 2016. Accordingly, the Defendant denied the extension of the period of stay against the Plaintiff A on November 1, 2016 on the ground that the Defendant rejected the extension of the period of stay due to the Plaintiff’s lack of financial capacity and uncertainty of the purpose of stay (hereinafter “instant Disposition 1”), ② the Plaintiff B, C, and D’s refusal to grant the extension of the period of stay on the ground that “the extension of the period of stay of the principal stay is
(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant dispositions” in total of the above dispositions against Plaintiff B, C, and D, and the purport of the entire pleadings and arguments as follows: (a) each of the instant dispositions and each of the instant dispositions, including the instant dispositions and the instant dispositions, is “each of the instant dispositions”
2. Whether each disposition of this case is lawful
A. The summary of the plaintiffs' assertion of this case is unlawful since the Disposition No. 1 of this case was abused or abused from discretion in the following point of view, and each of the Disposition No. 2 of this case based on the premise of the Disposition No.
1. Training in Korean language.