The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On July 28, 2012, at around 05:59, the Defendant: (a) 05:59 on the left-hand-hand-hand-hand-on-hand-on-hand-on-way-on-way-on-road-on-road-on-road-on-road-on-road-on-road-on-road-on-road-on-road-on-road-on-road-on-road-on-road-on-road-on-road-on-road-on-road-on-road-on-way-on-way-on-way-on-hand-on-on-hand-on-on-way-on-way-on-hand-on-on-way-on-hand-on-way-on-hand-on-way-on-way-on-way-on-way-on-way-on-way-on-way-on-on-way-on-way-on-way-on-way-on-way-on-on-way-on-way-on-on-way-on-way-on-on-way-way.

2. As to the facts charged in this case, the defendant argued that the defendant did not know of the facts charged in this case and did not escape from the match, and therefore, we examine whether the defendant was aware of the facts charged in this case at the time of the accident.

As shown in the facts charged, F made a statement that “F was aware that the Defendant’s vehicle was protruding even on the damaged vehicle, that the vehicle was set up to D, the husband, after the Defendant was faced with, and the vehicle was set up. The Defendant’s vehicle did not have been aware that it was her husband, and the vehicle was set off with the vehicle number. The Defendant’s vehicle was her body by reporting that the vehicle was her own, and her body was flaged at the time of the accident, and a sound was flaged.”

However, the following circumstances recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated, namely, D, the driver of the victimized vehicle, was unable to recognize the shockion of this case until the F, who was the chief offender, was informed of the accident.