logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.04.11 2017고단4207
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a license plate 124cc.

1. Around 02:50 on August 22, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (i.e., the U., the following measures): (a) driven the above Obaba, and driven the two-lanes in front of the D Hospital C, located in the window C of Changwon-si, along the one-lanes of the upper north elementary school, from the north north north high school surface; (b) the victim E, who temporarily stopped in front of the crosswalk, was working on the front part of the Obaba; and (c) the latter part of the vehicle, which the victim E, who temporarily stopped in front of the crosswalk, went away without taking necessary measures, to the extent that the total repair cost of KRW 494,437, including the exchange of Obaba, and thereby damaging the vehicle and destroying the vehicle.

2. On August 22, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) was under the influence of around 02:53, without a motor device bicycle license, and while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.126% in blood, the Defendant driven the above otoba and caused traffic accidents, such as paragraph 1, after driving the oba, and driving the oba, followed the two-lanes in front of the H located in G in the window of Changwon-si at Changwon-si, along the one-lane from the north north north north north middle distance to the upper north elementary school.

At the time of night, there was a flow of the front door door door, and there was a three-distance intersection, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by reducing speed and driving safely by checking well the front door.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to make a turn to the left at the H level located in G on the west-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu in order to find it late and avoid this. However, the Defendant was able to turn to the right part of the NAS-si car due to the Defendant’s Obscoping brooms.

After all, the defendant is a victim I (21 tax) who was on board the No.N. car due to the above occupational negligence, and the above No.N. S. S.

arrow