1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the instant case, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The Plaintiff did not submit a statement of grounds for appeal stating the specific grounds for appeal by the date for pleading of the first instance trial, and did not appear on the date for pleading of the first instance trial, and even if examining the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the first instance trial together with the evidence submitted in the first instance trial, it is justifiable to find facts in the first instance trial and determine the facts of the first instance trial). [The part that was modified] If the first instance judgment 2, 14, the “project operator: the Defendant” is deemed to be “project operator: Defendant, Gwangju City, and Gwangju Urban Management Corporation”

In the third and third of the judgment of the court of first instance, "No. 14" is deemed to be "No. 14, 16, 17 evidence".

The first instance court's 3th 11th son's 11th son's son's son's son's son's son'

Once the judgment of the court of first instance 3, the 12th case's "request" is accepted as "payment".

If the judgment of the court of first instance 3, the 19th court's "this court" is deemed to be "the first instance court".

In the judgment of the court of first instance, the "unit area per unit" of the 18th 18th e.g. is regarded as "unit area per unit cultivated area".

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case should be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Plaintiff

In spite of the order to prepare for the court, the attorney did not submit the statement of grounds for appeal by approximately 3.5 months, but was absent on the first date for pleading, but submitted the preparatory documents and documentary evidence 20 days after the closing of argument, and applied for resumption of pleading at the same time.

However, even if we look at the contents and attached documents of the argument, it seems that the above conclusion can not be followed, and it is not necessary to resume the pleading and further review it.