logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.14 2016고단1272
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. At the time of May 201 to August 8, 2011, the Defendant was liable for a debt amounting to KRW 13 million, and the unpaid amount of taxes equal to KRW 10 million was committed, while there was no particular property or income, there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed amount or to force the agency business or the supply of goods, even if the Defendant received money from the victim C on the pretext of borrowing money or doing an agency business or goods supply.

A. On June 11, 201, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would give the E agency opening business if he/she transfers KRW 20 million to an agency open cost, in the mutual infinite coffee shop on the road No. 2, Dongi-dong, Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul, to the effect that “if he/she transfers KRW 20 million to the agency open cost, he/she will start the agency business.”

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and was transferred KRW 20 million to the account in the name of F on the same day from the victim to the account in the F on the same day.

B. On August 5, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “I would pay the victim with the money if I would like to pay the money if I would have borrowed KRW 13 million as I would have borrowed the money and would have received or would have received the money if I would have paid the money.”

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred 13 million won to the account in the name of F on the same day from the victim.

(c)

On May 20, 201, the Defendant, at the same place as above, received a request from the injured person to rescue the goods of the D, shows the victim’s photograph of the goods taken on his/her mobile phone, and “on the transfer of the price, the goods are promptly completed and immediately sent.”

Note .

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; and (b) transferred the sum of KRW 15 million to the account in the G name on May 20, 2011; (c) KRW 5 million on June 2, 201; and (d) KRW 30 million on February 4, 2012, including KRW 10 million, from the victim to the account in the G name.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant is identical to the facts charged in the instant case.

arrow