1. A No. 3343 document prepared by the defendant's notary public against the plaintiff on a notarial deed of 1999.

According to the statement in Gap evidence No. 1, it is recognized that on September 15, 1999, the plaintiff prepared a notarized deed for debt repayment (hereinafter "notarial deed of this case") No. 3343 of the Cjoint Law Office No. 1999 that "the plaintiff borrowed KRW 1.3 million from the defendant on August 20, 199, and the defendant repay 13,000 won over 10 times from August 20, 199 to November 27, 199."

According to the above facts, the claim of this case on the Notarial Deed was completed on November 26, 2009 after ten years from the due date for payment as civil claim.

Therefore, compulsory execution based on the Notarial Deed of this case should not be permitted.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition by admitting it.