logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.05.19 2015가단116756
약정금
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

Basic Facts

Plaintiff

B Operation of the Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the J Licensed Real Estate Agent’s Office, a real estate consulting company, under the 110th category “I”, which is the H complex E, F, and G, in Daegu North Korea.

Plaintiff

K, who is the husband of B, is assisting the plaintiff B with mediation assistance and consulting assistance.

As the government development corporation, which had built a new I building to sell or lease it in lots, had 30 units, such as L 29 units and one commercial building for neighborhood living facilities (hereinafter “instant real estate”), among the above buildings, acquired the preferential right to benefit of the instant real estate from Korea, which is a specialized non-performing loan management company. After that, the Defendant D purchased the preferential right to benefit of the instant real estate from the 2nd securitization specialized company.

On April 19, 2013, the second securitization specialized company of the Republic of Korea paid to the Plaintiff Company KRW 50 million at the sales consulting cost of the instant real estate, which was determined to have been helpful for the conclusion of the contract by providing the said Company with information on the current status of the security at the time the said Company acquired the claim and the security right to the instant real estate, and the Defendant D’s visit the said Company for the sales of the claim.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3, Gap evidence Nos. 4-1, 2, and 5-1, 5-2, and Gap evidence Nos. 7-1, 7-6, the fact-finding results of this court's second asset-backed securitization limited liability company, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the plaintiffs' assertion as to the plaintiffs' claim, such as consulting fees, etc. with defendant Eul or Eul signed a consultation or brokerage contract on the real estate of this case with defendant Eul who is the purchaser of the real estate of this case, and conducted an investment analysis with the seller.

arrow