1. The defendant falls under each of the plaintiffs as stated in the attached Form 2 damage compensation statement as stated in the same Table.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant's purpose of housing construction business is "the defendant's apartment of this case", which is "FU apartment (hereinafter "FS") on the FTS's ground from the FS Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "FS").

'the construction of this case' below 'the construction of this case'.

was awarded a contract.

B. From January 2017 to December 2012, 2018, the Defendant, using construction equipment, such as digging machines, tents, and air routers, carried out household installation works, earth and sand works, file works, reinforced concrete works, etc. as listed below:

provided that:

6. The Road Packing among the Packing Works is excluded. (c) The plaintiffs (as stated in attached Table 1)

) The FW apartment located in FV near the construction site of this case (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s apartment”).

d) Residents living in the instant apartment, or the owners of the instant apartment. On the other hand, the instant construction contractor on August 9, 2016, FX Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “FX”).

) A change was made to and FX succeeded to the contract for construction works between the Defendant and FS. 【The ground for recognition, the fact that there was no dispute, Gap 3 through 5, 7 through 12, 14 through 16, Eul 5 and 6 (including the number of pages; hereinafter the same shall apply).

each entry, the result of the fact-finding on the original market in this court, and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. The summary of the plaintiffs' assertion (excluding the plaintiffs who did not state the amount in the "amount of damage, such as noise" column of attached Table 1) suffered mental suffering due to noise and vibration exceeding the ordinary reference limit generated at the construction site of this case, and the defendant is obligated to pay consolation money equivalent to each of the amounts stated in the "amount of damage, such as noise" column in attached Table 1 to the above plaintiffs.

In addition, in the case of the plaintiffs whose amount of money is indicated in the "amount of decrease in the property of the right to sunlight" or the "amount of consolation money of the right to sunlight" as shown in the attached Table 1, the defendant newly constructed the apartment of this case.