logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2014.10.29 2014고정89
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 14:00 on May 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 14:00, at the D’s house located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si; (b) as to whether the Victim E (the 57 years old and 57 years old) was fluored; and (c) as the victim was faced with the seaside outside of the house, the Defendant d's 4 balance of the 4-years and the 5-years and the 42-days and the fluoral knife caused the victim to suffer approximately KRW 42-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and D;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against the defendant, E, or D;

1. Each police statement made to E, D, and F;

1. The application of each complaint letter, each injury diagnosis letter, investigation report (complication of a complaint case), diagnosis statement, investigation report ( telephone conversations with the person for reference), investigation report (to be attached to the on-site photo of a female), photographs, investigation report (to be attached to the on-site photo), investigation report (to be attached to the suspect E-mail), investigation report (to be reported on the hearing of the counter statement of the person for shooting), petition, criminal investigation report (to be heard of the H telephone statement of the person for reference), one copy of investigation report, two copies of the next interview, and one copy of the resident inquiry report;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Code applicable to the crime and Article 257(1) of the choice of punishment [the choice of fine, the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the victim's knife did not do so, but considering each evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, H sufficiently recognized that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the judgment of the court. Meanwhile, at the time of the case, a female at the time of the case showed that he was the victim, and at the time, he did not know that the female was the victim, and later, he stated that he was aware of the fact that the female was the victim (108,109 pages and 109 pages of the investigation record, and that he was found witness because the defendant residing in the same Dong-dong around July 2013 was connected to the victim's injury case, but around that time, the defendant was found at his own house and that the female was the victim exceeded the stairs of the victim.

arrow