logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.04.21 2020고단427
위조유가증권행사등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence subparagraph 1 shall be forfeited from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 26, 2010, the defendant was sentenced to seven years in Seoul High Court to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), and completed the execution of the sentence in Seoul Southern Prison on May 21, 2016. On April 28, 2017, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced one year of imprisonment to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Seoul Southern District Court on April 27, 2018.

피고인은 성명불상자와 함께 피해자들에게 아이팟, 상품권 등을 구입할 것처럼 거짓말을 하고, 피해자들이 지정한 계좌로 위조된 당좌수표를 입금시켜 마치 정상적으로 대금이 입금된 것처럼 피해자들을 기망한 후, 피해자들로부터 아이팟, 상품권 등을 교부받아 편취하기로 공모하였다.

1. Counterfeitd securities events;

A. On April 10, 2019, the Defendant issued D a check as a substitute engineer on the street of the C cafeteria located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stating that “A bag No. 1 in the form of a check number f, face value 298,500,000, and No. 1) of the E-type E-type 1, which was forged by the Defendant, is marked as “a bank deposit in lieu of a check number” and “A bank deposit in lieu of a check number” to D who is aware of the forgery of the check was issued as if the check was actually issued.

B. On April 26, 2019, the Defendant introduced him as H director in front of the old department store store located in Guri-si, and issued I a false check as if the check was actually issued, stating that the Defendant, as an employee of Siri-si, placed an envelope in one sheet of the number of shares issued by the JJ head of the JJ association and the branch office (K, face value of 60,000,000 won) that was forged by the Defendant, the Defendant, as an employee of Siri-si, stated that “A request the bank to deposit the check in lieu of the number of shares per book,” and issued the check as if the check was actually issued.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the person who was not the party to the name, exercised the forged securities more than twice.

2...

arrow