logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2016.09.21 2016누11153
도로점용료 등 부과처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: “Gubuk-ri” in the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as “Gu Uniform-ri”; “310 square meters” in the second sentence shall be deemed as “102.42 square meters”; “2.42 square meters” in the second part shall be deemed as “102.42 square meters”; and “Article 42(3) of the second part shall be deemed as identical to the entry of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance except for each height in the second sentence under Article 42(3) of the “B” and Article 42 subparag. 3 of the Civil Procedure Act. As such, it

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow