logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.10.06 2016나2510
공사대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is a person who runs a construction business under the trade name of “C”.

On August 12, 2014, the Defendant’s mother D agreed to pay D the lease deposit amount of KRW 10,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 780,000 as KRW 17,80,000,000, in advance, the lease deposit amount of KRW 17,800,000, out of KRW 17,800,000, the remainder of KRW 15,300,000, on the date of the contract, and the remainder of KRW 15,30,00,00 as the date on which D can use and benefit from the instant store.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). The approval for use of the instant store was delayed, D requested that E be granted a prior delivery of the said store to E, and that E be granted a license for the interior work from October 2014.

Accordingly, on October 17, 2014, the Defendant, who actually operates the instant store, concluded the interior construction contract with the Plaintiff on October 17, 2014, as follows:

(hereinafter referred to as “instant construction contract”). [The construction site area of H: 12 square meters: From October 20, 2014 to November 7, 2014: 24,000 won [The total construction cost = 8,212,00 won on the left-hand side wall (the entrance construction outside the entrance) : 4,615,000 won: 4,612,000 won on the right-hand side wall (the store, store, meeting room) 4,569,50 won on the upper-hand side (the above construction site area of H: 1,690,000 won (the pipe and personnel expenses): 210,000 won (the pipe and water supply), 210,100,000 won (the total construction cost) on the day of the construction contract; 10,000 won (the down payment of the down payment and the remainder of construction cost); 10,000 won (the above construction cost) and the remainder of the construction cost)

arrow