logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.11.11 2019나313174
양수금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following order shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant’s fee payment agreement 1) Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) on May 13, 2016

(1) The agreement with the following (hereinafter referred to as “instant agreement”) shall be

(C) written statement. Article 1 (Purpose) / [Defendant] / [Article 1] / [Purpose] / [Case E (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”)]

[2] The attraction of purchase funds and the consultation for sale of real estate in connection with the sale business of the building in lots shall be entrusted to [D], and [D] shall accept them. Article 2 (Business Contents] / [D] / [1] The consulting business of the building in this case] / [D] Article 3 (Fees) [Defendant] of the Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea, / [D] Article 7 (Penalties] of the Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea Development Bank of Korea

(hereinafter) (2) D and the Defendant provide that “The Defendant borrowed KRW 2 billion from D and repaid KRW 3.2 billion up to November 12, 2016” (hereinafter “the instant loan agreement”) with the Defendant, May 13, 2016, stating that “The Defendant borrowed KRW 2 billion from D and repaid KRW 3.2 billion by November 12, 2016.”

(3) At that time, the Defendant jointly and severally and severally agreed to the written statement. The Defendant: (a) made a cash storage certificate (hereinafter “the cash storage certificate of this case”) dated May 13, 2016, stating that “The Defendant is keeping KRW 200 million deposited by D” in D.

4) On May 23, 2016, H issued and delivered promissory notes with a face value of KRW 2.3 billion in D, and the promissory notes notarial deeds pertaining thereto (hereinafter “notarial deeds of this case”).

b. D’s attraction of investment money 1) The Defendant is also drawn up with a total of KRW 1.8 billion from May 10, 2016 to May 13, 2016 to 13, 2016 (hereinafter “the instant investors”).

arrow