The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case that the Defendant provided or leased private-use trucks for money in the carriage of cargo, since he received only labor costs according to the standard unit price table while running a package transport business. Therefore, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant entered into a packing director agreement with D and Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu apartment to transport D's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c' on February 18, 2013. Although the above packing director agreement entered into between the defendant and D includes 3 million c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c's c' 's c' 's c' c' c' c' c' c' c' c' c' c's c's c'.

In light of the above, the facts charged in this case can be fully recognized that the defendant provided a private-use truck for a fee for transportation of cargo, so the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts is without merit.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.