1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part of the judgment against the Plaintiff ordering payment is revoked.

2. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with respect to a vehicle A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with respect to the vehicle B (hereinafter “Defendant”).

나. 원고 차량은 2017. 9. 14. 14:30경 광주 서구에 있는 죽봉대로(이하 ‘이 사건 주도로’라 한다. 이 사건 주도로는 편도 3차로인 우회전 전용도로와 연결되는 지점 전까지는 편도 5차로였다가 위 우회전 전용도로와 연결되는 지점에서 차로가 1개 늘어나면서 편도 6차로가 된다.)와 연결되는 위 우회전 전용도로 중 2차로를 광천터미널 방향에서 농성교차로 �향으로 진행하다가 우회전하여 이 사건 주도로로 진입하고 있었는데, 피고 차량이 위 우회전 전용도로 중 1차로를 진행하다가 우회전하여 이 사건 주도로로 진입하면서 피고 차량의 오른쪽 뒷바퀴 부분으로 원고 차량의 좌측면 뒷부분을 충격하였다

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

On October 16, 2017, the Plaintiff paid KRW 13,096,00 as insurance money for the repair cost of the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 4, 6 through 9, Eul evidence 2 and 3 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant vehicle passed along the left side of the plaintiff vehicle and caused the accident of this case. The plaintiff asserts that the responsibility for the accident of this case lies entirely on the defendant vehicle.

As to this, the defendant did not enter the six-lane, which is the most right-hand side of the main road of this case, and entered the five-lane among the main roads of this case, and the accident of this case occurred.