Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall assault an election campaign worker in connection with an election.

Nevertheless, at around 20:25 on June 2, 2014, the Defendant observed the election campaign by candidates G election campaign workers belonging to the F Party, who were going to run in the election of the 2nd election district of the 6nd election district of the 2nd election district of the 2nd election district of the 2nd election district of the 2nd election district of the 2nd election district of the 2nd election district of the 2014, and took a bath for the reason that the election campaign by the F Party, who was engaged in an unreasonable appraisal, was not in mind. While the Defendant took the Defendant’s form of the victim H (27 years of age), the Defendant, who is the above G election campaign worker, taken the Defendant’s cell phone, and expressed that “the victim “the victim H (27 years of age), who is flick, sticked on the flick, write off the flick, flish the victim’s face.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to H, I, J, and K;

1. A list of seized articles and a list of seized articles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (at the site of a case), a report on investigation (Attachment of evidentiary photographs), a closure on the surface of the crime, and a photograph

1. Article 237 (1) 1 of the Public Official Election Act and Article 237 (1) 1 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case where the defendant spits spits or assaults the victim's bath and spits on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is contrary to the purpose of the Public Official Election Act, which intends to protect the freedom of election, and is an act going beyond the infringement of personal legal interests of the victim. The fact that the defendant did not receive a letter from the victim is a condition for sentencing unfavorable to the defendant.

However, the extent of violence against the victim is relatively minor, the defendant has no specific criminal power for the last 20 years, the fact that the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime, and deposit 20,000 won to the victim.