logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2021.02.16 2019나64591
공사대금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the defendant ordering payment to the plaintiff A in excess of the following amount shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The E-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-D-B-B-B-B-B-B-D-B-B-B-B-D-B-B-B-D-B-B-D-B-D-D-B-D.

2) At the time the Defendant entered into a subcontract with the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. for the instant construction project, L is responsible for and complete the instant construction project within the scope of the amount of KRW 2,680,00,00 in the above-mentioned manner (i.e., basic type 2,083,725,332 expansion type 596,274,68, whichever is about 92.10% of the amount subcontracted by the Defendant from the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd.).

arrow