logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2019.06.13 2018고단1665
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 3, 2018, from around 14:10 to 15:30 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) stated on the victim C in Jin-si to the effect that the money from the "Din-si," operated by the victim C, coming from the invasion to the winding of water; (b) stated that the money from the "Din-si" operated by the victim C in Jin-si, would turn out the water to the outside of the water; and (c) stated that the victim would break out the water to the outside of the water; and (d) the Defendant again found on the above high water so that the victim would break out the water to the outside of the water and let the victim break out the water to the extent that the victim's left hand by cutting down the water from the water, and let the victim break out the water to the outside of the police so that he would break out the water, and (d) the Defendant would break out the water again to the outside of the water and let the victim break out the water to the outside of the police."

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the business of the victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing grounds under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is the confession of the defendant, the fact that the defendant has agreed with the victim, and the defendant's age, occupation, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the conditions of various sentencing as shown in the argument of this case shall be determined as ordered by taking into account

arrow