1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On December 1, 2006, the Plaintiff’s summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion made a loan of KRW 30,000,000 to C for one year after the maturity of one year, and the interest rate was 3.5% per month, and the Defendant jointly and severally guaranteed C’s obligation of the above loan.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff KRW 30,000,000 as well as agreed interest and delay damages.

2. Although there are evidence evidence No. 1, which corresponds to the above facts, as to whether the Defendant jointly and severally guaranteed the above loan debt, the above loan loan certificate is insufficient to acknowledge the authenticity of the above loan certificate. Unless there is any other evidence to acknowledge it, the above loan certificate cannot be used as evidence.

(E) In light of the above, the Plaintiff stated that C prepared the part of the Defendant’s name of the above loan certificate, and there is no evidence to prove that C obtained the Defendant’s authority to prepare the part of the joint and several surety of the above loan certificate on behalf of the Defendant). There is no other evidence to prove the Defendant’s joint

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.