The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal is unfair because the punishment (6 months of imprisonment and confiscation) of the court below is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the judgment, the facts that the Defendant led to the confession of a crime are favorable reasons for sentencing, and even though the said judgment was sentenced to a fine on June 14, 2016 and became final and conclusive on June 22, 2016, it was immediately re-offending. The fact that the Defendant was an offense during the period of repeated crime resulting from a crime is an unfavorable reason for sentencing.

In full view of the above sentencing factors, in full view of the Defendant’s age, family relation, economic situation, background and motive leading to the commission of the crime, and all other matters on the sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments of this case, the judgment of the court below is deemed appropriate, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.