logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.10.17 2019나30134
보증금반환
Text

1. The part of the first instance judgment against the Defendants shall be revoked.

2. The plaintiff's primary claim against the defendant C.

Reasons

1. Scope of the judgment of this court;

A. In the first instance trial of Defendant C’s appeal, the part of the Plaintiff’s primary claim against Defendant C and B and the Plaintiff’s conjunctive claim against Defendant D against Defendant C was cited, but the Plaintiff’s respective claim against B and Defendant D was dismissed, and the part of the first instance judgment against Defendant C was appealed.

B. Where one of the main co-litigants and the conjunctive co-litigants files an appeal against the conjunctive defendant D in a subjective and preliminary co-litigation, the final and conclusive part of the claim concerning other co-litigants shall be prevented, and the appeal shall be transferred to the appellate court and subject to adjudication (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Du17765, Mar. 27, 2008). In such a case, the subject of adjudication on appeal shall be determined in consideration of the need for the final and conclusive conclusion between the main and preliminary co-litigants and their other parties.

(see Supreme Court Decision 2009Da43355, Feb. 24, 2011). Therefore, due to the instant appeal by Defendant C, the primary co-litigants, the confirmation of the Plaintiff’s claim part concerning Defendant D, which is the conjunctive co-litigants, was prevented, and became subject to adjudication by this Court.

C. On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s claim against B and the primary Defendant C against B is an ordinary co-litigation that does not need to be united.

In ordinary co-litigations, the effect of final blocking due to an appeal shall only be effective for the appellant and his counterpart, and no claim against other co-litigants shall be effective.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da7076, Sept. 29, 201). Therefore, Defendant C’s appeal only causes the Plaintiff, who is the other party, and is another co-litigants of the first instance court. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim against B among the judgment of the first instance court became final and conclusive by failing to file an appeal against the part for which the Plaintiff’s claim against B was dismissed

2. Facts of recognition;

A. B: (a) February 2016.

arrow