Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

On February 5, 2018, the Defendant used a gap in E convenience stores located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government where C is working, in which surveillance is neglected, to put up two urban areas equivalent to KRW 9,000, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 3,600, and two c,500, and one c,500,000, which are located in the display site in the place of the location, into a bank, and entered a c,00,000 c, a c,50,000 c, in the attached list of crimes in the instant indictment, and entered the police statement against the victim, the Defendant is recognized as having the same fact as the entry in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes in the attached Form.

In this regard, it is clear that the prosecutor, while instituting a prosecution, erroneously recorded this part of the facts charged in the indictment in the separate crime Nos. 11:42 on February 5, 2018, which occurred on February 11:42, 2018, in the separate crime No. 2, which occurred on February 9, 2018, rather than the facts charged in the separate crime No. 2, which occurred on February 11:48, 2018. As such, this part of the facts charged is revised, such as the entry in the column of the criminal history in the corresponding list of crimes

From around that time to February 17, 2018, food equivalent to KRW 113,400 in total was stolen and stolen on seven occasions, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Each written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of photographs (a thief damaged thief on February 17, 2018) and CCTV-cape photographs statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order [Any unfavorable circumstance] The fact that another person commits the instant crime in the same kind during the period of suspension of execution despite having been subject to criminal punishment several times for the same type of crime (a favorable circumstance] is against the mistake by recognizing all the crimes.