The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the imprisonment of six months, the suspension of the execution of two years, the probation, the community service order of 40 hours, the additional collection of 12.3 million won) declared by the court below is too uneasy and unreasonable.

2. The judgment below held that the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and requires strict punishment in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture. In particular, even though the defendant had a record of criminal punishment of fines in 2014 by arranging sexual traffic at the same place as the place of the crime in this case, it seems that the crime in this case is not good to be committed again, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be considered newly after the sentence of the judgment below.

In addition, the defendant reflects the crime of this case and again refrain from committing the same mistake, and there is no record of criminal punishment heavier than the suspension of qualification prior to the crime of this case.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the following factors, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details and contents of the offense, and circumstances after the offense, etc., the sentencing conditions specified in the instant records and pleadings do not seem to be unfair as the sentence imposed by the lower court is too uneasible

Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.