The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant led to the confession and mistake of the instant crime, and that the Defendant’s health is not good, the Defendant again committed each of the instant crimes despite having been punished for three times due to the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and in particular, on September 30, 201, after having been sentenced to one year and two months due to the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence), which was prior to the instant crime, on January 15, 2012, the Defendant committed the instant crime even during the repeated period after the execution of the sentence was completed, and other various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and pleadings, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.