logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.12.21 2018가단8370
대여금
Text

1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally serve as KRW 38,00,000 on the Plaintiff and as a result, from April 14, 1998 to March 5, 2008.

Reasons

1. Re-claim for the interruption of extinctive prescription of the claim against the Defendants indicated in the claim as Busan District Court Decision 2008Gadan7682 decided Nov. 20, 2008

2. Applicable provisions;

A. Defendant B: Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act, and the Defendant did not submit a written answer even after being served with a duplicate of the complaint, and did not appear on the date for pleading. Therefore, it is deemed that all the Plaintiff’s allegations were led to confession under Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act).

(b) Defendant C or D: Judgment by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow