The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On October 26, 2013, the Defendant, around 09:30, damaged the victim’s reputation by stating that “the victim’s reputation was unfairly paid one million won from the Defendant, and that “the victim’s reputation was lost by stating that the victim would have to return it to the Defendant, even though there were many people, such as B, and C, in front of the Kim Jong-dong, Kim Jong-dong, 241 (Haak-dong), Kim Jong-dong, Kim Jong-dong, Kim Jong-dong, and Kim Jong-dong, the victim called “the head of a party”.

2. The conclusion of the judgment is the case that falls under Article 307(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act.

However, the victim D may recognize the fact that he/she submitted a written withdrawal of complaint to withdraw his/her wishing to punish the defendant on September 5, 2014, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.