beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B shall share one-half of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 and the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On May 22, 1985, the head of the Daejeon District Court, the head of the Daejeon District Court, the registry office, and the head of the Daejeon District Court, the registration of transfer of the entire shares of all co-owners arising from sale in the Plaintiff’s future, was completed as of May 22, 1985, and the registration of transfer of ownership was completed on the ground of “sale on November 21, 2012” as of November 21, 2012 by the receipt of the same registry office as of November 21, 2012.
B. However, the Plaintiff’s disposal of the above woodland to G was null and void as it was conducted without a resolution of the Plaintiff’s lawful clan general assembly, and thus, the Plaintiff’s registration of transfer of ownership in G name was null and void.
C. Nevertheless, G: (a) on February 26, 2014 and April 16, 2015, G refers to “the land of this case 0” in accordance with the sequence No. 1 through No. 7, all of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 through No. 7.
() After dividing the above real estate into the Defendants, each of the above real estate was sold to the Defendants. As to the instant land and the instant land No. 1/2 shares, Defendant B’s ownership transfer registration number No. 7198, which was received on May 11, 2015, and the ownership transfer registration number No. 7199, which was received on May 11, 2015, as to the instant land No. 2 and the instant land No. 7199, which was received on May 11, 2015, Defendant C’s ownership transfer registration as to the instant land No. 4 and the instant land No. 7196, which was received on May 11, 2015, the head of the Daejeon District Court and the registry office of the Daejeon District Court, and the ownership transfer registration as to the instant land No. 5, No. 1/2 shares among the instant land, and the instant land No. 6 and No. 7, there were no grounds for dispute over each of the instant land No. 17, and No. 7.
2. According to the above facts of recognition, G, an unentitled person, is null and void of each act of disposal of each land of this case against the Defendants, and the Defendants’ respective act of disposal based on the registration of ownership transfer of invalid G.