logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.06.05 2019고단1084
무고
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 22, 2018, at the “C” beauty room of the Defendant’s operation in Ulsandong-gu, U.S., the Defendant reported D B’s advertisement, and started the operation on the e (25 years old) shoulder and the e-mail, which was the customer, but E demanded the Defendant to suspend the operation without having the mind to confirm the process of the operation, such as the green bottom, and on the following day, the Defendant demanded the Defendant to refund 80,000 won for the treatment expenses paid in advance by telephone, and compensation for the expenses for re-operation for the Defendant’s operation.

The Defendant, who did not complete a training course for the basic course of the scam and performed the scam to E in a state without any particular experience of the scam, and around March 23, 2018, 700,000 won out of the expenses of the scambling that was paid in advance to E was refunded, but could not accept any additional compensation, such as the cost of the scambling industry, but continued to dispute E.

At around 19:00 on April 10, 2018, the Defendant submitted to the police officer a written complaint stating that “in a cosmetic room, he/she was raped from E he/she was undergoing a scambling procedure, in a cosmetic room,” within the Dong-dong Police Station of Dong-gu, Ulsan-gu, 11:00, the Defendant continued to stop his/her own while he/she was undergoing a scambling procedure, and she scams his/her clothes over the scam, scams his/her clothes into the scambscam, and scams into the scambscam, after he/she scameded into the scambscam,” which was run between March 22, 2018.

The statement was made to the effect that "......."

However, in fact, E did not have raped the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant filed a false complaint with the aim of having E receive criminal punishment, and made a false accusation against E.

Summary of Evidence

1. The statements of the witness F and E in the third and fifth trial records;

1. Police officers and suspects of suspect examinations of E;

1. The criminal defendant's accusation, the police's statement, and the suspect's interrogation protocol for the defendant.

arrow