1. The Defendant’s KRW 265,620,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from December 31, 2015 to April 6, 2016.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 3 through 5 and 7 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff company entered into an advertising agency contract with the defendant company on August 14, 2015 with the content that the plaintiff company carries out the business of selling advertisement, etc. of the fish-dong Housing Association; the plaintiff company engaged in the business of manufacturing advertisements, etc. according to the above contract; the defendant company entered into an agreement on November 11, 2015 with the plaintiff company to pay advertising expenses of KRW 29,620,000 (including value-added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply) up to December 20, 2015, but failed to comply with such agreement; however, the plaintiff company did not pay advertising expenses up to December 22, 2015 to the plaintiff company until December 30, 2015. However, the defendant company did not recognize the remainder of the advertising expenses up to the date of payment of the advertising expenses.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant company is obligated to pay to the plaintiff company 260 million won (the agreed amount of KRW 290.62 million - the agreed amount of KRW 290.62 million - the agreed amount of KRW 25 million) and damages for delay calculated at each rate of 15% per annum as stipulated in the Commercial Act from December 31, 2015 to April 6, 2016, when the copy of the complaint of this case is served on the defendant company, as the plaintiff company seeks, from the date of the agreed payment to the date of full payment.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff company's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.