logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.06.01 2016가합109834
관리비
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant K 4,891,810 won and the interest rate of 15% per annum from December 13, 2016 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

Basic Facts

V commercial buildings (hereinafter “instant commercial building”) are composed of 50 stores in Southyang-si, the position of the parties, and the Defendants are the co-owners of the instant commercial building or the lessee who leased the relevant part from the sectional owners, and the Plaintiff is the company with the objective of building management business, etc.

1) Management and dispute resolution of the commercial building of this case 1) Management and dispute resolution 1) An organization established by a part of the sectional owners of the commercial building of this case (hereinafter “V commercial building number association”).

(2) Around June 13, 2009, the Plaintiff concluded an entrustment contract for the management of the instant commercial building (hereinafter referred to as “V representative meeting”) with the terms of entrusting the management of the instant commercial building to W. 2) On August 25, 2011, another of the sectional owners of the instant commercial building (hereinafter referred to as “V representative meeting”) established an extraordinary general meeting and elected X as its representative (hereinafter referred to as “the resolution of August 25, 201”). The V representative meeting concluded a contract with the Y Co., Ltd. on the terms of entrusting the management of the instant commercial building and notified W of the termination of the said entrustment contract. 3) Some sectional owners of the instant commercial building held the Z as the representative of the Z on August 23, 2012, and the council established a general meeting of occupants’ representatives (hereinafter referred to as “V representative meeting”) at the general meeting of 201, the council of occupants’ representatives (hereinafter referred to as “A. 25, 2012”).

(4) On August 2015, AA concluded a management service agreement with the Plaintiff regarding the instant commercial building in the name of the “representative of the management body,” and on March 2, 2017, notified the Plaintiff of the termination of the management service agreement. The Plaintiff, after entering into the said agreement, was elected as the representative of the management body.

arrow