logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.08.23 2017나307199
소유권이전등기
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The appeal costs.

Reasons

1. The ground for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted to the court of first instance shows evidence No. 14, the plaintiff's claim for prescriptive acquisition is rejected, and the fact-finding and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the claim that the above counterclaim constitutes abuse of rights, citing the claim for counterclaim of this case, is justified.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and all appeals against the plaintiff's principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

arrow