1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded in the trial room, shall be modified as follows.

The defendant.

Basic Facts

Around February 2016, the Plaintiff’s claim against D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) asserted that the Plaintiff lent money several times from April 2013 to October 2013, and that the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the return of loan under Seoul Central District Court Decision 2016Da502923, which stated that “D shall pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum to the Plaintiff from December 24, 2015 to the date of full payment” (hereinafter “the recommendation of settlement in this case”).

D’s vehicle security D Co., Ltd. entered into an operation lease agreement with C Co., Ltd. on August 8, 2012 with E (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

On November 12, 2013, the Plaintiff succeeded to the status of the lessee of D.

D The representative director F was invested KRW 67 million by the Defendant around April 2013, and the Defendant paid a return on investment from KRW 1 million to KRW 1.8 million per month.

Since January 2014, the operation of the investment return could not be paid.

F shall prepare a loan certificate (hereinafter “the loan certificate of this case”) on January 21, 2014, stating that “I will pay 67 million won and 30% interest per annum until February 28, 2014,” which was demanded by the defendant and G (the spouse of the defendant) to return the investment amount delegated by the defendant and the defendant, and that “I will pay 30 million won until February 5, 2014,” and at the defendant’s request that “I will pay 30 million won until February 5, 2014,” and “I will waive their criminal liability for the vehicle” (hereinafter “I will waive the loan certificate of this case”) and “I will waive their own criminal liability for the vehicle of this case if I will waive their sales as of February 5, 2014.”