A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. On December 10, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the business was a person who works for daily use at the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C in Jung-gu, Seoul. On December 21, 2018, the Defendant refused to pay the victim 400,000 won for the reason that the Defendant had already been paid wages. The Defendant: (a) the Defendant was a person who works for the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C in Jung-gu, Seoul; (b) the Defendant called the “D” restaurant; and (c) the Defendant was a person who was working for the said restaurant; and (d) the employees who had been working for the restaurant were also out of the hospital.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim's restaurant by force.

2. At around 23:45 on December 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) stated that “Sick G, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Central Police Station in Jung-gu Seoul Central Police Station in Jung-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, “Sick-gu, Sick-gu, Sick-gu, Sick-gu, a police officer belonging to the said earth group, “Woo-gu, Sick-gu, Sick-gu, Sick-gu, Sick-gu, a social problem, is the issue; and (b) sought documents such as a letter of arrest in the act of committing an offense cited by the said G, and assaulted him on the face of the said G.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the prevention, investigation, and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning C and G;

1. Investigation report (related to the attachment of CCTV images to the F District);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (related to the verification of CCTV images at a Dcafeteria);

1. Relevant Articles 314(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts of obstruction of the performance of official duties;

U.S. Imprisonment

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending punishment] 1] Interference with business, the basic area of obstruction of performance of official duties [the category 1] is the basic area of obstruction of performance of official duties [the category 1].