1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. According to the authenticity of the instant agreement and the purport of the entire pleadings, it is recognized that the document dated March 19, 2015 (Evidence A; hereinafter “instant agreement”) written on March 19, 2015, as follows, on which the rubber name plate in the Defendant’s name is affixed, was written.

계약 약정서 원고의 피고에 대한 스크� 보증금 오천만 원(￦50,000,000)에 대하여 원고와 피고 사이에 다음과 같이 약정한다.

(계약 목적) 원고의 스크� 보증금 오천만 원(￦50,000,000)에 대하여 피고로 반입되는 스크�과 반출되는 스크�은 원고가 허락하지 않는 한 제3자에게 판매하지 않도록 한다.

Provided, That the enterprise designated by the Plaintiff may take measures.

스크� 시장가격에서 일반철(고철) kg당 205원, 스덴 24종 Kg당 310원으로 한다.

스크� 금액 중 매월 300만 원씩 보증금에서 갚아나간다.

P. For the S month, class 24 tons of scrap metal 20t scrap metal 40ton should be guaranteed conditions; as recognized earlier, the instant agreement has affixed a rubber name plate in the name of the Defendant; on the other hand, the Defendant asserts that D has used the rubber name plate in the name of the Defendant; on the other hand, the following circumstances acknowledged by Gap’s entries in the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4; the witness testimony and arguments of the first instance court; i.e., the Plaintiff remitted KRW 50 million to the Defendant’s account on March 20, 2015 as stipulated in the instant agreement; ii) on August 7, 2017, D had purchased the Defendant’s representative director’s name and affixed the rubber name on the instant agreement (No. 4); and (iii) purchased the Defendant’s name and affixed it on April 17, 2017 as a witness.