logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.05.25 2015고단2072
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 2072"

1. On August 2009, the defrauded against the victim C is running the business of collecting, transporting, and selling soil and stones in the Defendant’s office located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City D building B 508, and the victim is running the business of collecting, transporting, and selling soil and stones on three lots outside the Gyeonggi-do Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and 10% of the principal and profits will be paid after one month of lending KRW 50 million.

“.....”

However, in fact, the above F F F F F F F F F F land requires considerable time to start work through administrative measures and financing procedures for purchasing land, and related oil sales business also requires considerable time to secure the site of gas stations and purchase alcoholic beverages. The Defendant was thought to invest some of the damaged money in the Japanese wind power generation project. At the time, the Defendant borrowed money from others and made an investment in the said construction project without any particular property, and thus, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed money from the damaged person.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, acquired the total amount of KRW 5 million from August 14, 2009 to the Japanese bank account under the name of the Defendant, and KRW 52 million from August 21, 2009 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of G, and acquired the total amount of KRW 52 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of G.

2. On August 2009, the Defendant’s fraud against the victim H was to pay 30% of the principal and profits for the month following the month when he lent KRW 50 million at the cost of installing a tank, through the Defendant’s office of the above paragraph (1) above, through I, the victim’s “it is going against the business of gathering, transporting, etc. soil and rocks on three pages outside the J of Kimpo-si of Gyeonggi-do, Kimpo-si.” In this regard, the Defendant is also trying to operate oil sales business.

“.....”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed the money from the injured party, such as the above 1.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such.

arrow