All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

1. Defendant A and B maintained the judgment of the first instance court that found Defendant A guilty of the facts charged of this case.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the crime of assault, damage to property, and the establishment of

2. Defendant C maintained the judgment of the first instance court that found Defendant C guilty of the instant facts charged.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower judgment did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules.

According to the records, the Defendant asserted self-defense or legitimate act in the statement of grounds for appeal, and even if the first trial of the lower court did not clearly withdraw his/her assertion on the grounds for appeal, the lower court determined that the Defendant’s grounds for appeal was erroneous and did not render any judgment on the grounds for self-defense or legitimate act.

However, even if examining the record, the defendant's act cannot be seen as self-defense or legitimate act. Thus, the omission of judgment by the court below cannot be deemed to have affected the conclusion of the judgment.

3. Defendant D maintained the judgment of the first instance court that found Defendant D guilty of the instant facts charged.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the intent of assault

4. The Defendants’ final appeal is dismissed in entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.