logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.01.17 2019나2042281
임금
Text

1. The appeal by the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) shall be dismissed;

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. No independent appeal may be filed against a judgment on the costs of lawsuit;

Article 391 of the Civil Procedure Act (Article 391 of the Civil Procedure Act). The purport of this Article is that if a person who has no objection against a judgment on the merits is entitled to file a separate objection against a judgment on the burden of expenses, which is an incidental trial, in order to raise the propriety of the cost-bearing, the judgment on the merits should be examined again in order to raise the propriety of the judgment on the merits. Thus, the purport of this Article is that the provisions are not permitted unless they are accompanied by an objection against the judgment on the merits. It cannot be deemed that the provisions violate Articles 11(1), 23(1), 27(1) and 34(1)

(see Supreme Court Order 91Ma726, Dec. 30, 1991). 2. The Plaintiff’s appeal that the part of the lawsuit cost of the first instance judgment is unreasonable is unlawful, since the Plaintiff’s appeal that the part of the lawsuit cost of the first instance judgment is inappropriate is an appeal against the part that

arrow