logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.14 2016고단2058
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant committed the following crimes under the state that the defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to mental illness such as non-social personality disorder:

[2016 Highest 2058]

1. On March 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 08:00, at subway 1 line located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, the Defendant: (b) demanded the victim D (the age of 32) who was in charge of the duty of guiding passengers and regulating illegal boarding; (c) the Defendant was denied the request for a subway-free passenger vehicle.

이에 피고인은 피해자에게 지하철 안으로 들여 보내 달라며 큰 소리를 지르고 계속하여 피해자 주위를 맴돌며 “500 원을 달라.” 고 하고 피해자가 “ 없다.

“Matherh”, “Latherhhh, if any,”

The victim interfered with the victim's work by force for about five minutes by avoiding disturbance, such as passing sound.

2. Around 08:05 on March 30, 2015, the Defendant abused the victim’s face one time by taking the victim’s face from the victim E (23 tax) who observed the above disturbance at the above location. On the other hand, the Defendant assaulted the victim by taking the victim’s face from the victim E (23 tax).

[2016 Highest 3586]

3. On May 16, 2016, around 05:00, the Defendant used toilets from 12th floor F of the Seoul detention center “Seoul detention center” located in Annyang-ro 143, Annyang-ro 143 on May 16, 201, on the ground that the Defendant used the toilets, but first, he was found to have used the toilets from the victim G (26 years old) who entered the toilets, but she was found to have the victim’s right eye by gathering brooms located in the toilets, thereby getting off the victim’s right eye, leading the victim to treatment for the number of days.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 Highest 2058: Facts No. 1 and 2 of the Decision]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. Statement made by the police against E [the fact set forth in the Judgment No. 3586 of the Highest 2016:

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by a special judicial police officer with respect to G (a point of view to a point of view);

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

arrow