logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.11.16 2015고단875
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a DNA car.

1. On May 4, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (unclaimed Measures after Accidents) driving the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.147% on blood alcohol level on May 4, 2015, and driving the said vehicle along three-lane roads in front of Fmat E at the time of Fmat at the time of Fmat at the time of Fast City, along the boundary of the hospital in the front southdo.

At night, it was difficult at the time, and the defendant's moving direction had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering gear and brakes with the driver of the vehicle. In this case, the driver of the vehicle had a duty of care to look at the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and right

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to do so, was negligent in driving the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the Defendant’s vehicle driving, and received the part behind the Victim G Driving.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim G by the foregoing occupational negligence during approximately two weeks of medical treatment, such as salt ties and tensions, etc., and at the same time, the Defendant destroyed the franchising car in an amount equivalent to KRW 2,472,512, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) went away at a level of 180 meters after causing a traffic accident, such as the date and time set forth in paragraph (1), at the place set forth in paragraph (1), and was driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.147% on the same day, and was driving the said vehicle in front of the Bapoman High School located in the interests of Bapo

On the left side of the defendant's running direction, there is a book in India, and thus, it is prohibited to enter the vehicle into the above park for a person driving the vehicle.

arrow