1. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 2,867,100, and KRW 500,000 for each of the said money and each of the said money from June 3, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Nonparty E went to the corridor around 10:30 on June 3, 2015, when he was enrolled in the fourth grade of the first grade F elementary school in the former week, and caused an accident of collision without viewing the Plaintiff A, who opened a class of the fourth grade six classes of the said elementary school.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

Due to the instant accident, Plaintiff A suffered bodily injury, such as the frame, closure, and detailed uncertainty of the inside and bottom of the floor, and suffered damage from the loss of the inside of the disaster. While treating the above mentioned above, the treatment costs of KRW 1,757,100 were spent in total as stated in the attached medical expenses statement, and KRW 110,000 was disbursed in purchasing new scamblings.

C. Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the father of Nonparty E.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 10 (including each number in case of additional number), the purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The plaintiff A suffered damages, such as medical expenses and expenses for the purchase of safe guard, etc. incurred by the non-party E's negligence as above. The defendant is obligated to compensate for the property and mental distress suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case pursuant to Article 755 of the Civil Code.

B. The specific amount of damages that the Defendant shall compensate is as follows.

(1) Plaintiff A medical fee: 110,000 consolation money for purchase of KRW 1,757,100: 1,000 for consolation money for purchase of KRW 1,000 for 1,00 ( Taking into account all the circumstances shown in the arguments, such as the circumstances and place of the instant accident, Plaintiff A and Nonparty E’s age at the time of the instant accident, Plaintiff A’s injury part and degree, Plaintiff’s attitude after the instant accident, and Defendant’s attitude after the instant accident). (2) Plaintiff B and C consolation money for purchase of KRW 50,00 for 50,000 for

C. Accordingly, the Defendant’s defense against the Plaintiff A as to the existence or scope of the instant obligation from June 3, 2015, which was the date of the instant accident, as to the Plaintiff’s KRW 2,867,100, Plaintiff B, and C, and each of the said money.