Text
Defendant
And all appeals filed by the person against whom the attachment order is requested (the requester for the protective order) and the prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Defendant 1) The sentence of the lower court (two years and six months) against the Defendant and the person who requested the attachment order (the requester of the protective order; hereinafter “Defendant”) is too unreasonable.
2) The Prosecutor’s sentence is too unhued and unreasonable.
B. The court below's dismissal of an attachment order and an order for protection observation, despite the risk of recommitting murder crimes, is unfair.
2. Determination:
A. In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime under consideration of the following: (a) the victim was injured by a spack, which is a dangerous object, on the ground that the victim took a bath without having repaid his money; (b) the victim attempted to murder three times in the knife; (c) the Defendant had a large number of violent criminal records and attempted murder; (d) the Defendant had a criminal record of multiple criminal records and attempted murder; (b) the Defendant agreed with the victim; and (c) the Defendant led the Defendant to the Defendant to commit the instant crime; and (d) the Defendant led to the Defendant’s confession of the facts of the crime and reflects his mistake; and (e) the Defendant’s age, sex, criminal conduct, environment, health conditions, circumstances after the commission of the instant crime; and (e) the scope of the Defendant’s recommendation of the sentencing committee’s punishment (at least two years and six months), the lower court’s punishment was unfairly heavy or less.
It does not appear.
B. 1) The lower court held that the Defendant’s request for an attachment order and a protective observation order is based on the following: (a) the Defendant’s application of the risk assessment tool to repeat the crime; and (b) the risk of recidivism as a result of evaluation of screening the screen of the mentally ill person; (c) the crime of attempted murder of this case is considered in the motive; and (d) the agreement with the victim is reached; and (e) the time interval between the time of punishment for the same crime and the crime of attempted murder of this case is about 13 years.