logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.07.24 2017고합73
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

5 copies (No. 5), 2,000,000 won (No. 6), which have been seized.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On October 19, 2004, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime at the Suwon District Court Sejong District Court on August 23, 2012; two years from imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime; on July 30, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for habitual larceny at the Suwon District Court on July 30, 2015; and on September 13, 2016, the execution of the sentence was completed at the original prison on September 13, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On October 3, 2016, around 15:20, the Defendant 15:20, the Defendant cited a 150,000 won in cash, which is a cash owned by the victim, using a lush cresh in which the victim D was able to carry out a lush funeral.

2. On February 20, 2017, at around 13:12 on February 20, 2017, the Defendant taken out one female-only room that contains a 600,000 won in cash owned by the victim in front of a bicycle set up by the victim F, and a smartphone equivalent to 2.50,000 won in the market value.

They go back.

3. On May 12, 2017, at around 14:40, the Defendant went into the residence of the victim C in Pyeongtaek-si G, and went out with a 670,000 won in cash and a 700,000 won in the market price of the victim’s clothes located in the inside room.

As a result, the Defendant was sentenced twice or more to larceny, etc., and habitually stolen another’s property within three years after the execution of the sentence was completed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements C, D, and F;

1. Previous records of judgment: Inquiry into criminal records, each investigation report (the confirmation of the period of a criminal suspect's repeated crime and confirmation of the records of habitual larceny punishment);

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to recognize dampness in light of the records of each crime in the judgment, the fact that the same kind of crime was committed again within the short time after release, and the method of committing such crime;

1. Article 5-4(6) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes as to the crime, and Article 5-4 of the Criminal Act.

arrow