Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant did not have been authorized by C or D to accept the preparation of a letter of commitment or to prepare a letter of commitment.

On August 12, 2011, the Defendant, within the F Office located in Jung-gu, Seoul, proposed on August 12, 201, the representative of the said office G, who knows the fact, to pay the amount of goods worth KRW 172,00,00 in the blank with an official seal-type pen in blank, as goods located in the I goods warehouse, the Defendant shall be liable for civil and criminal liability and to pay the amount of goods worth KRW 172,00,00,00,000, creditor F representative G, debtor H H representative C, D, and the above state. If the I logistics warehouse arbitrarily moves the goods, the Defendant himself will be legally liable for the transfer of the goods at will. The Defendant signed and obstructed the Defendant’s signature on A side.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant prepared a copy of the payment letter, which is a private document concerning rights and obligations, using the qualification of the agent of the above C and D.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place, delivered a letter of payment prepared as above to the J of F, which knew of such fact, was exercised.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each legal statement of the witness C, D and J;

1. Description of a Letter of Payment and Application of the Existing Statutes

1. Article 232 of the Criminal Act and Article 234 of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (a point of uttering of qualification-based private document);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Determination on the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of the workhouse

1. The defendant and his defense counsel are only documents in the name of the defendant, and they are not documents prepared as proxy of C and D.